Week 5 Recap Blendos Summer Basketball Leagues 2025
- Blendos Summer Leagues
- Jul 11
- 16 min read


Week 5 Blendos Summer Basketball League Analysis


Game at 10 AM: IR Supply (Navy) vs. Evan Lane Law (GOLD)
Final Score: IRR Supply 100, Evan Lane Law 72
Key Stats: IRR Supply - 21/39 FG (53.8%), 18/36 3P (50.0%), 4/8 FT (50.0%); Evan Lane Law - 22/39 FG (56.4%), 9/32 3P (28.1%), 1/3 FT (33.3%)
Standouts: Graham Wooden (38 pts), Cyrus Megale (37 pts)
Key Players:
IRR Supply: Graham Wooden (38 points, 10 assists, double-double), Devon Chabot (double-double), Zach Gilebarto (22 points)
Evan Lane Law: Evan Lane (37 points, 17 rebounds), Cyrus Megale (19 points)
Special Note: Evan Lane’s 17 rebounds, while significant, mark a season-low for him, a testament to IRR Supply’s defensive strategy effectively limiting his usual rebounding dominance.
Key Metrics:
IRR Supply: 21 successful field attempts out of 39 (53.8% efficiency), 18 accurate long-range shots out of 36 (50.0% proficiency), 4 made foul shots out of 8 (50.0% effectiveness)
Evan Lane Law: 22 successful field attempts out of 39 (56.4% efficiency), 9 accurate long-range shots out of 32 (28.1% proficiency), 1 made foul shot out of 3 (33.3% effectiveness)
Team Aggregate and Disparities:
Total Points: IRR Supply 100, Evan Lane Law 72 (IR Supply +28)
Field Attempts: IRR Supply 21/39 (53.8%), Evan Lane Law 22/39 (56.4%) (Evan Lane Law +2.6% accuracy, but IRR Supply’s higher output from equal attempts highlights their offensive edge, driven by Wooden’s 38 and Gilberato’s 22)
Long-Range Shots: IRR Supply 18/36 (50.0%), Evan Lane Law 9/32 (28.1%) (IRR Supply +9 makes, +22.9% efficiency
Foul Shots: IRR Supply 4/8 (50.0%), Evan Lane Law 1/3 (33.3%) IR Supply +3 makes
Comparison of Additional Stats (from box score totals):
Steals (STL): IRR Supply 8, Evan Lane Law 4 (IR Supply +4, reflecting stronger defensive pressure
Blocks (BLK): IRR Supply 1, Evan Lane Law 0 (IR Supply +1
Assists (AST): IRR Supply 15, Evan Lane Law 10 (IR Supply +5, with Wooden’s 10 assists a key factor in their playmaking edge)
Rebounds (DEF): IR Supply 35, Evan Lane Law 37 (Evan Lane Law +2, demonstrating control of the boards, despite Evan Lane’s 17 season low.
Turnovers (TO): IRR Supply 10, Evan Lane Law 12 (Evan Lane Law +2, suggesting IRR Supply’s better ball security)
Team Ranking Context: IRR Supply’s 100 points and +28 margin rank them among the top performers this week, behind their own 107 from 12 PM but ahead of McCoy (92), Oneonta (80, 82), and Table Rock Fitness (78, 69). Evan Lane Law’s 72 points place them mid-tier, above Searles (44), Dante’s (44), and Giacomelli (69) in margin.
Game Efficiency Index (GEI):
IR Supply: (100 + 21 + 4 – 39 – 8 + 25 + 15 + 6 + (0.5 * 3) – 8) / 70.03 = (100 + 21 + 4 – 39 – 8 + 25 + 15 + 6 + 1.5 – 8) / 70.03 = 117.5 / 70.03 ≈ 1.68
Evan Lane Law: (72 + 22 + 1 – 39 – 3 + 18 + 10 + 4 + (0.5 * 1) – 12) / 70.03 = (72 + 22 + 1 – 39 – 3 + 18 + 10 + 4 + 0.5 – 12) / 70.03 = 73.5 / 70.03 ≈ 1.05
Insight: IR Supply’s GEI of 1.68 reflects a strong performance, significantly outpacing Evan Lane Law’s 1.05, driven by higher positive contributions (points, field goals, rebounds, assists) and fewer negatives.

Catksill Region Surveying Services only had 3 players available to participate in this game which resulted in a forfeit.


Game Recap: IRR Supply Dominates Giacomelli Landscaping
Final Score
IRR Supply: 107
Giacomelli Landscaping: 69
Key Stats
IRR Supply: 37/72 FG (51.4%), 10/27 3P (37.0%), 3/7 FT (42.9%)
Giacomelli Landscaping: 19/36 FG (52.8%), 10/42 3P (23.8%), 1/2 FT (50.0%)
Standout Performers
Devon Chabot (IRR Supply): 34 points, 12 rebounds, a double-double force!
Stevie Melendez (Giacomelli Landscaping): 28 points, 9 Rebounds shining bright.
Key Players
IRR Supply:
Devon Chabot - 34 points, 12 rebounds
Graham Wooden - 24 points, 11 assists (double-double)
Jon Codrington - 14 points, 11 rebounds, 6 assists (double-double)
Kevin Kurkowski - 24 points, 13 rebounds, 8 assists (double-double, near triple-double)
Marc Rivera - 8 points, 7 assists, 13 rebounds (near triple-double)
Giacomelli Landscaping:
Stevie Melendez - 28 points, 9 Rebounds
Dillon Hill- 16 points 7 rebounds
Key Metrics
IRR Supply: 37/72 field goals (51.4% efficiency), 10/27 three-pointers (37.0% proficiency), 3/7 free throws (42.9% effectiveness)
Giacomelli Landscaping: 19/36 field goals (52.8% efficiency), 10/42 three-pointers (23.8% proficiency), 1/2 free throws (50.0% effectiveness)
Team Aggregate and Disparities
Total Points: IRR Supply 107, Giacomelli Landscaping 69 (IRR Supply +38)
Field Attempts: IRR Supply 37/72 (51.4%), Giacomelli Landscaping 19/36 (52.8%) - Giacomelli Landscaping edges in accuracy (+1.4%), but IRR Supply’s 36 extra attempts and 18 more makes show their volume advantage.
Long-Range Shots: IRR Supply 10/27 (37.0%), Giacomelli Landscaping 10/42 (23.8%) - Tied makes, but IRR Supply’s +13.2% efficiency highlights smarter shot selection.
Foul Shots: IRR Supply 3/7 (42.9%), Giacomelli Landscaping 1/2 (50.0%)
Additional Stats Comparison
Steals: IRR Supply 6, Giacomelli Landscaping 3 (IRR Supply +3
Blocks: IRR Supply 3, Giacomelli Landscaping 2 (IRR Supply +1
Assists: IRR Supply 36, Giacomelli Landscaping 14 (IRR Supply +22
Rebounds: IRR Supply 64, Giacomelli Landscaping 36 (IRR Supply +28
Turnovers: IRR Supply 7, Giacomelli Landscaping 8 (Giacomelli Landscaping +1
Team Ranking Context
IRR Supply’s 107 points and +38 margin lead the week, topping McCoy (92), Oneonta (80, 82), and more. Giacomelli Landscaping’s 69 points beat Searles (44) and Dante’s (44) but fall short of Evan Lane Law (72).
Game Efficiency Index (GEI)
IRR Supply: (107 + 37 + 3 – 72 – 7 + 30 + 20 + 8 + 1 – 10) / 70.03 = 117 / 70.03 ≈ 1.67
Giacomelli Landscaping: (69 + 17 + 1 – 36 – 2 + 15 + 12 + 3 + 1.5 – 36) / 70.03 = 46.5 / 70.03 ≈ 0.66
Insight
IRR Supply’s GEI of 1.67 towers over Giacomelli Landscaping’s 0.66, with Devon Chabot’s 34-point, 12-rebound double-double leading a roster of double-doubles and near-triple-doubles, bolstered by a massive rebounding and assist edge, while Giacomelli Landscaping’s slight turnover advantage offers little offset.


Game at 1 PM: Pine Peaks Painting (Indigo Blue) vs. McCoy Construction LLC (Grey)
Final Score
McCoy Construction LLC (Grey): 92
Pine Peaks Painting (Indigo Blue): 66
Team Stats
McCoy Construction LLC (Grey): 29/56 FG (51.8%), 11/31 3P (35.5%), 1/3 FT (33.3%), 60 rebounds, 20 assists.
Pine Peaks Painting (Indigo Blue): 19/32 FG (59.4%), 9/41 3P (22.0%), 1/4 FT (25.0%), 35 rebounds, 12 assists.
Key Players
Zyeir Lawrence (McCoy): 44 points, 14/23 FG, 3 assists, 2 steals.
Xavier Beers (McCoy): 18 points, 3/4 FG, 1/1 3PM, 3 assists.
Karrie Lawrence (McCoy): 10 points, 1/1 FG, 1 assist.
Connor Wayman (Pine Peaks): 21 points, 7/10 FG, 2/10 3PM, 2 assists.
Hunter Balcom (Pine Peaks): 15 points, 3/7 FG, 2 steals, 2 blocks.
Key Metrics
McCoy Construction LLC (Grey): 29/56 FG (51.8%), 11/31 3P (35.5%), 1/3 FT (33.3%).
Pine Peaks Painting (Indigo Blue): 19/32 FG (59.4%), 9/41 3P (22.0%), 1/4 FT (25.0%).
Team Aggregate and Disparities
Total Points: McCoy 92, Pine Peaks 66 (McCoy +26).
Field Attempts: McCoy 29/56 (51.8%), Pine Peaks 19/32 (59.4%) (Pine Peaks +7.6% accuracy, McCoy +24 attempts, +10 makes).
Long-Range Shots: McCoy 11/31 (35.5%), Pine Peaks 9/41 (22.0%) (McCoy +2 makes, +13.5% efficiency).
Foul Shots: McCoy 1/3 (33.3%), Pine Peaks 1/4 (25.0%) (Tie in makes, McCoy +8.3% efficiency).
Additional Stats:
Steals: McCoy 6, Pine Peaks 9 (Pine Peaks +3).
Blocks: McCoy 0, Pine Peaks 2 (Pine Peaks +2).
Assists: McCoy 20, Pine Peaks 12 (McCoy +8).
Rebounds: McCoy 60, Pine Peaks 35 (McCoy +25).
Turnovers: McCoy 14, Pine Peaks 11 (Pine Peaks +3).
Team Ranking Context
McCoy’s 92 points and +26 margin rank high for the week, topping Pine Peaks’ 66 and matching competitive scores.
Game Efficiency Index (GEI)
McCoy Construction LLC (Grey): 1.41.
Pine Peaks Painting (Indigo Blue): 1.04.
Insight: McCoy’s edge comes from Zyeir Lawrence’s 44-point, 14-rebound game and a +25 rebounding advantage, despite Pine Peaks’ defensive contributions.

Game at 2 PM: Oneonta Boys & Girls Club vs. Searles Garage
Final Score
Searles Garage: 44Oneonta Boys & Girls Club: 70
Team Stats
Searles Garage: 17/46 FG (37.0%), 1/18 3P (5.6%), 7/10 FT (70.0%), 39 rebounds, 13 assists.
Oneonta Boys & Girls Club: 28/46 FG (60.9%), 4/31 3P (12.9%), 2/4 FT (50.0%), 48 rebounds, 20 assists.
Key Players
Ray Williams (Searles): 10 points, 3/8 FG, 4 rebounds, 1 steal.
Derek Burns (Searles): 7 points, 2/4 FG, 2 assists.
Pat Terk (Searles): 8 points, 3/9 FG, 2 steals.
Makya Morrison (Oneonta): 22 points, 11/15 FG, 4 steals, 4 blocks, 20 rebounds.
Cooper LaBarge (Oneonta): 21 points, 6/10 FG, 3/12 3P, 2 steals.
Ty LaBarge (Oneonta): 12 points, 10 rebounds, 8 assists (double-double).
Key Metrics
Searles Garage: 17/46 FG (37.0%), 1/18 3P (5.6%), 7/10 FT (70.0%).Oneonta Boys & Girls Club: 28/46 FG (60.9%), 4/31 3P (12.9%), 2/4 FT (50.0%).
Team Aggregate and Disparities
Total Points: Searles 44, Oneonta 70 (Oneonta +26).Field Attempts: Searles 17/46 (37.0%), Oneonta 28/46 (60.9%) (Oneonta +23.9% accuracy, +11 makes).Long-Range Shots: Searles 1/18 (5.6%), Oneonta 4/31 (12.9%) (Oneonta +3 makes, +7.3% efficiency).Foul Shots: Searles 7/10 (70.0%), Oneonta 2/4 (50.0%) (Searles +5 makes, +20.0% efficiency).
Additional Stats
Steals: Searles 6, Oneonta 13 (Oneonta +7).Blocks: Searles 2, Oneonta 4 (Oneonta +2).Assists: Searles 13, Oneonta 20 (Oneonta +7).Rebounds: Searles 39, Oneonta 48 (Oneonta +9).Turnovers: Searles 15, Oneonta 17 (Searles +2).
Team Ranking Context
Oneonta’s 70 points and +26 margin rank high for the week, overshadowing Searles’ 44 and aligning with top competitive scores in the league.
Game Efficiency Index (GEI)
Searles Garage: 0.84.Oneonta Boys & Girls Club: 1.35.
Insight
Oneonta’s commanding victory was driven by Makya Morrison’s dominant 22-point, 20-rebound, 4-steal, 4-block performance, complemented by Cooper LaBarge’s 21 points and Ty LaBarge’s double-double (12 points, 10 rebounds, 8 assists). Searles struggled with a -9 rebounding deficit and a 1/18 (5.6%) three-point shooting performance, which was an anomaly compared to their typical output from beyond the arc this season. Despite a relatively low 15 turnovers, Searles couldn’t match Oneonta’s offensive efficiency and defensive pressure.


Game Recap: Searles Garage vs. McCoy Construction LLC
Final Score:
Searles Garage: 93
McCoy Construction LLC: 105
Team Stats
Searles Garage: 25/66 FG (37.9%), 14/30 3P (46.7%), 1/3 FT (33.3%), 35 rebounds, 22 assists.
McCoy Construction LLC: 30/43 FG (69.8%), 15/33 3P (45.5%), 44 rebounds, 24 assists.
Key Players
Searles Garage:
Ray Williams: 28 points, 6/9 FG, 5/7 3P, 3 rebounds, 4 assists.
Derek Burns: 25 points, 5/14 FG, 3/10 3P, 6 rebounds, 3 assists.
Gavin VanEtten: 22 points, 8/22 FG, 1/2 3P, 9 rebounds, 6 assists.
McCoy Construction LLC:
Jazz Burks: 26 points, 7/11 FG, 4/6 3P, 11 rebounds, 11 assists (Player of the Game).
Zyeir Lawrence: 22 points, 8/10 FG, 2/2 3P, 15 rebounds, 6 assists.
Xavier Beers: 22 points, 6/13 FG, 1/3 3P, 4 rebounds, 1 assist.
Rob Scianimanico: 20 points, 10/14 FG, 16 rebounds, 1 assist.
Nick Applegate: 15 points, 3/4 FG, 3/7 3P, 2 rebounds, 2 assists.
Key Metrics
Searles Garage: 25/66 FG (37.9%), 14/30 3P (46.7%), 1/3 FT (33.3%).McCoy Construction LLC: 30/43 FG (69.8%), 15/33 3P (45.5%).
Team Aggregate and Disparities
Total Points: Searles 93, McCoy 105 (McCoy +12).
Field Attempts: Searles 25/66 (37.9%), McCoy 30/43 (69.8%) (McCoy +31.9% accuracy, +5 makes).
Long-Range Shots: Searles 14/30 (46.7%), McCoy 15/33 (45.5%) (McCoy +1 make, -1.2% efficiency).
Foul Shots: Searles 1/3 (33.3%), McCoy 0/0 (N/A) (Searles +1 make).
Additional Stats
Steals: Searles 15, McCoy 6 (Searles +9).
Blocks: Searles 1, McCoy 4 (McCoy +3).
Assists: Searles 22, McCoy 24 (McCoy +2).
Rebounds: Searles 35, McCoy 44 (McCoy +9).
Turnovers: Searles 10, McCoy 20 (McCoy +10).
Team Ranking Context
McCoy’s 105 points and +12 margin, with a +9 rebounding edge and all players scoring in double figures, mark a dominant team performance, potentially ranking high within the league for the week. Searles’ 93 points reflect a competitive effort despite the loss.
Game Efficiency Index (GEI)
Searles Garage: 1.02
McCoy Construction LLC: 1.18
Insight
McCoy Construction LLC secured a close victory, with Jazz Burks earning Player of the Game honors for his 26-point, 11-rebound, 11-assist triple-double. Zyeir Lawrence (22 points, 15 rebounds, 6 assists), Xavier Beers (22 points), and Rob Scianimanico (20 points, 16 rebounds) provided robust support, while Nick Applegate added 15 points, with McCoy’s depth and a +9 rebounding advantage (44 rebounds) proving decisive. Searles Garage fought back with Ray Williams’ 28 points, Derek Burns’ 25 points, and Gavin VanEtten’s 22-point, 9-rebound effort, supported by 14 three-pointers (46.7%). However, McCoy’s superior field goal accuracy (69.8%) and rebounding edge overcame Searles’ edge in steals (15) and turnovers forced (10 vs. 20).
Video can be found here:

Game at 4 PM: Oneonta Boys & Girls Club vs. Five Star Subaru/Benson Agency
Final Score
Oneonta Boys & Girls Club: 82
Five Star Subaru/Benson Agency: 66
Team Stats
Oneonta Boys & Girls Club: 23/50 FG (46.0%), 10/30 3P (33.3%), 6/10 FT (60.0%), 43 rebounds, 23 assists.
Five Star Subaru/Benson Agency: 16/35 FG (45.7%), 9/22 3P (40.9%), 7/10 FT (70.0%), 35 rebounds, 14 assists.
Key Players
Oneonta Boys & Girls Club:
Cooper LaBarge: 20 points, 4/7 FG, 4/12 3P, 1 steal, 4 assists.
Makya Morison: 18 points, 5/10 FG, 2/2 3P, 2/3 FT, 2 steals, 6 assists.
Christian Lawson: 15 points, 5/13 FG, 1/1 3P, 2/3 FT, 2 steals, 2 assists.
Five Star Subaru/Benson Agency:
Kaiden Legree: 21 points, 6/12 FG, 3/5 3P, 4 rebounds, 4 assists.
Spencer Williams: 18 points, 3/5 FG, 3/5 3P, 3/4 FT, 1 steal.
Tori Gue: 10 points, 4/6 FG, 2/2 FT, 1 steal, 4 assists.
Key Metrics
Oneonta Boys & Girls Club: 23/50 FG (46.0%), 10/30 3P (33.3%), 6/10 FT (60.0%).
Five Star Subaru/Benson Agency: 16/35 FG (45.7%), 9/22 3P (40.9%), 7/10 FT (70.0%).
Team Aggregate and Disparities
Total Points: Oneonta 82, Five Star 66 (Oneonta +16). Field Attempts: Oneonta 23/50 (46.0%), Five Star 16/35 (45.7%) (Oneonta +0.3% accuracy, +7 makes). Long-Range Shots: Oneonta 10/30 (33.3%), Five Star 9/22 (40.9%) (Oneonta +1 make, Five Star +7.6% efficiency). Foul Shots: Oneonta 6/10 (60.0%), Five Star 7/10 (70.0%) (Five Star +10% efficiency, +1 make).
Additional Stats
Steals: Oneonta 12, Five Star 3 (Oneonta +9). Blocks: Oneonta 5, Five Star 2 (Oneonta +3). Assists: Oneonta 23, Five Star 14 (Oneonta +9). Rebounds: Oneonta 43, Five Star 35 (Oneonta +8). Turnovers: Oneonta 11, Five Star 17 (Five Star +6).
Team Ranking Context
Oneonta’s 82 points and +16 margin, with a +8 rebounding edge and strong assist numbers (23), suggest a cohesive team effort that could rank well within the league. Five Star’s 66 points indicate a struggle, particularly with 17 turnovers and fewer assists, despite a solid free-throw performance.
Game Efficiency Index (GEI)
Oneonta Boys & Girls Club: 1.15
Five Star Subaru/Benson Agency: 0.95
Insight
Oneonta Boys & Girls Club secured a 16-point victory, driven by a balanced attack and defensive pressure, forcing 17 turnovers. Cooper LaBarge (20 points) and Makya Morison (18 points, 6 assists) led the scoring, with Christian Lawson (15 points, 2 steals) providing key contributions. Five Star Subaru/Benson Agency fought back with Kaiden Legree’s 21 points and Spencer Williams’ 18 points, but their 17 turnovers and lower assist total (14) hindered their effort. Oneonta’s rebounding edge (+8) and steal advantage (+9) were decisive factors in the win.

Husted's Trucking was unable to field at least 4 players resulting in a forfeit loss.

Game at 5:15 PM (Rescheduled): Oneonta Boys & Girls Club vs. Dante's Pizzeria (Red)
Final Score
Dante's Pizzeria (Red): 78
Oneonta Boys & Girls Club (Sky Blue): 80
Team Stats
Dante's Pizzeria (Red): 17/43 FG (39.5%), 13/31 3P (41.9%), 5/10 FT (50.0%), 41 rebounds, 12 assists.
Oneonta Boys & Girls Club (Sky Blue): 21/37 FG (56.8%), 12/32 3P (37.5%), 2/4 FT (50.0%), 23 defensive rebounds, 23 assists.
Key Players
Dante's Pizzeria (Red):
Jo Annan: 31 points, 17/17 FG, 4/6 3P, 3/3 FT, 6 assists.
Dan Njoku: 25 points, 3/3 FG, 11/11 3P, 1/2 FT, 2 assists.
Will Iyere: 9 points, 1/6 FG, 3/11 3P, 2 steals.
Oneonta Boys & Girls Club (Sky Blue):
Maya Morrison: 19 points, 3/8 FG, 1 steal, 6 assists.
Christian Lawson: 30 points, 6/8 FG, 6/12 3P, 2 steals.
Ty LaBarge: 10 points, 3/6 FG, 1/3 3P, 1/2 FT, 10 assists, 14 rebounds.
Cooper LaBarge: 15 points, 3/6 FG, 1/3 3P, 2 steals.
Key Metrics
Dante's Pizzeria (Red): 17/43 FG (39.5%), 13/31 3P (41.9%), 5/10 FT (50.0%).
Oneonta Boys & Girls Club (Sky Blue): 21/37 FG (56.8%), 12/32 3P (37.5%), 2/4 FT (50.0%).
Team Aggregate and Disparities
Total Points: Dante's 78, Oneonta 80 (Oneonta +2).
Field Attempts: Dante's 17/43 (39.5%), Oneonta 21/37 (56.8%) (Oneonta +17.3% accuracy, +4 makes).
Long-Range Shots: Dante's 13/31 (41.9%), Oneonta 12/32 (37.5%) (Dante's +1 make, +4.4% efficiency).
Foul Shots: Dante's 5/10 (50.0%), Oneonta 2/4 (50.0%) (Tie in efficiency, Dante's +3 m
Additional Stats
Steals: Dante's 5, Oneonta 7 (Oneonta +2).
Blocks: Dante's 1, Oneonta 4 (Oneonta +3).
Assists: Dante's 12, Oneonta 23 (Oneonta +11).
Rebounds: Dante's 41, Oneonta 23 (Dante's +18).
Turnovers: Dante's 7, Oneonta 8 (Dante's -1).
Team Ranking Context
Oneonta’s 80 points and +2 margin, with a 56.8% field goal percentage and 23 assists, highlight a highly efficient and team-oriented performance, though their rebounding (23) was outpaced. Dante’s 78 points and 41 rebounds showcase a strong rebounding game, but their FG% (39.5%) and lower assist total suggest less team cohesion.
Game Efficiency Index (GEI)Dante's Pizzeria (Red): 0.95Oneonta Boys & Girls Club (Sky Blue): 1.10
Insight
Oneonta Boys & Girls Club (Sky Blue) secured a tight 2-point victory, driven by Christian Lawson’s 30-point performance, Maya Morrison’s 19 points, and Ty LaBarge’s triple-double (10 points, 10 assists, 14 rebounds), capped by a huge steal late in the game to seal the win. Their 23 assists underscored a cohesive effort. Dante's Pizzeria countered with Jo Annan’s 31 points, Dan Njoku’s 25 points, and a dominant rebounding edge (+18), but Will Iyere’s 9 points on 1/6 FG reflected shooting challenges. Oneonta’s defensive blocks (+3) and steals (+2) were key in the close finish.


Game Recap: Integrated Chiropractic/Evermore Accounting (Red) vs. Catskill Mtn Ginseng Co. (Black)
Final Score
Integrated Chiropractic/Evermore Accounting (Red): 70
Catskill Mtn Ginseng Co. (Black): 107
Team Stats
Integrated Chiropractic/Evermore Accounting (Red): 12/34 FG (35.3%), 13/34 3P (38.2%), 7/12 FT (58.3%), 44 rebounds, 8 assists.Catskill Mtn Ginseng Co. (Black): 28/53 FG (52.8%), 16/37 3P (43.2%), 3/7 FT (42.9%), 25 rebounds, 26 assists.
Key Players
Integrated Chiropractic/Evermore Accounting (Red):
Brock Davis: 28 points, 2/6 FG, 7/14 3P, 3/5 FT, 4 rebounds.
Ryan Linsey: 19 points, 2/6 FG, 5/10 3P, 2/2 FT, 1 steal.
Preston Eaves: 7 points, 2/3 FG, 1/5 3P, 1 steal.
Catskill Mtn Ginseng Co. (Black):
Aaron Smith: 31 points, 3/6 2P, 8/16 3P, 1/2 FT, 10 assists.
Arie Brunson: 17 points, 4/9 FG, 3/6 3P, 12 rebounds.
Seamus DeMauro: 21 points, 9/11 FG, 1/1 3P, 1 block, 1 rebound.
Travis Moyer: 13 points, 4/8 FG, 1/2 3P, 2 steals, 6 rebounds.
Key Metrics
Integrated Chiropractic/Evermore Accounting (Red): 12/34 FG (35.3%), 13/34 3P (38.2%), 7/12 FT (58.3%).
Catskill Mtn Ginseng Co. (Black): 28/53 FG (52.8%), 16/37 3P (43.2%), 3/7 FT (42.9%).
Team Aggregate and Disparities
Total Points: Integrated 70, Catskill 107 (Catskill +37).
Field Attempts: Integrated 12/34 (35.3%), Catskill 28/53 (52.8%) (Catskill +17.5% accuracy, +16 makes).
Long-Range Shots: Integrated 13/34 (38.2%), Catskill 16/37 (43.2%) (Catskill +3 makes, +5.0% efficiency).
Foul Shots: Integrated 7/12 (58.3%), Catskill 3/7 (42.9%) (Integrated +15.4% efficiency, +4 makes).
Additional Stats
Steals: Integrated 2, Catskill 14 (Catskill +12).
Blocks: Integrated 3, Catskill 3 (Tie).
Assists: Integrated 8, Catskill 26 (Catskill +18).
Rebounds: Integrated 44, Catskill 25 (Integrated +19).
Turnovers: Integrated 16, Catskill 7 (Catskill -9).
Team Ranking Context
Catskill’s 107 points and +37 margin, with a 52.8% field goal percentage, 16/37 from three-point range (43.2%), and 26 assists, indicate a dominant, highly efficient, and team-oriented performance. Integrated’s 70 points and 44 rebounds show a strong rebounding effort, but their FG% (35.3%) and 16 turnovers highlight significant struggles.
Game Efficiency Index (GEI)
Integrated Chiropractic/Evermore Accounting (Red): 0.85
Catskill Mtn Ginseng Co. (Black): 1.20
Insight
Catskill Mtn Ginseng Co. (Black) delivered a commanding 37-point victory, with Aaron Smith earning player of the game honors with 31 points, including 3/6 from two-point range and 8/16 from three-point range, plus 10 assists, and Arie Brunson adding a double-double with 17 points and 12 rebounds. Their 16/37 three-point shooting performance (43.2%) and 26 assists showcased exceptional team play. Integrated Chiropractic/Evermore Accounting (Red) relied on Brock Davis’ 28 points and Ryan Linsey’s 19 points, bolstered by a robust rebounding edge (+19), but their 35.3% field goal rate and 16 turnovers proved costly. Catskill’s balanced attack and defensive pressure, including 14 steals, secured the win.
Game at 6:00


Game at 7 PM: Table Rock Fitness vs. MAMCO


Game at 8:00
Key Players:
Sloan's / DL Baker Contracting: Ben Helme (25 points, 12 rebounds)
Table Rock Fitness: Trevor Huntsman (19 points, 4 rebounds)
Multiple Game Teams: Performance Comparison with Game Efficiency Index (GEI)
The GEI is calculated as (PTS + FGM + FTM – FGA – FTA + TRB + AST + STL + (0.5 BLK) – TO) / (LeagueAvgPTS + LeagueAvgFGM + LeagueAvgFTM – LeagueAvgFGA – LeagueAvgFTA + LeagueAvgTRB + LeagueAvgAST + LeagueAvgSTL + (0.5 LeagueAvgBLK) – LeagueAvgTO), with LeagueAvg ≈ 70.03.
IRR Supply (Navy):
10 AM: GEI = 117.5 / 70.03 ≈ 1.68
12 PM: GEI = 117 / 70.03 ≈ 1.67
Comparison: IR Supply was slightly more effective at 10 AM (GEI 1.68) than at 12 PM (GEI 1.67), with a marginally better balance of positives (e.g., Wooden’s assists) and fewer turnovers relative to attempts, despite a higher scoring output at 12 PM.
Oneonta Boys & Girls Club:
4 PM: GEI = 104.5 / 70.03 ≈ 1.49
5:15 PM: GEI = 95 / 70.03 ≈ 1.36
Comparison: Oneonta was more effective at 4 PM (GEI 1.49) than at 5:15 PM (GEI 1.36), driven by higher assists and rebounds, though 5:15 PM’s higher field goal efficiency (56.8%) kept it competitive.
Table Rock Fitness:
7 PM: GEI = 85 / 70.03 ≈ 1.21
8 PM: GEI = 65 / 70.03 ≈ 0.93
Comparison: Table Rock Fitness was more effective at 7 PM (GEI 1.21) than at 8 PM (GEI 0.93), reflecting a higher point total and better rebounding, with 8 PM’s increased turnovers reducing efficiency.
A LEAGUE RECAP WEEK 3

We have Blendos Shorts Available for Purchase
And there might be rumblings of an Oneonta Octane comeback!


Don't miss out on the 4th annual Blend-A-Rama community 3 on 3 basketball tournament in Oneonta NY august 2nd and 3rd.
























Comments